Procedure mainly to the court’s own activities in their supervision of the trial. And other supervisory measures are all subject to the court from outside the supervision of judicial activities. The right to exercise jurisdiction to protect the people’s court, must be strengthened oversight mechanisms, with the way our judicial reform, the Full Court and the sole judges of the
Court by the independent implementation of the right to try cases, the judge’s role further expanded to meet this requirement the exercise of jurisdiction is the supervision of judges must also be strengthened, nike dunks and the right to restrict if not subject to supervision and will inevitably lead to arbitrariness and abuse, and even the formation of corruption. Of course, the
Supervision must be institutionalized into law, while in strengthening supervision, must be resolutely opposed to arbitrary intervention in the administration of justice activities, and certain leading cadres to words on behalf of the law, independent courts handling cases of acts of intervention, not only is not proper supervision, and may be illegal should be corrected. The monitoring measures in the
Procedure Mainly To The Court’s
State Organs. The System
State organs. The system of supervision and judicial supervision procedure is different. Performance in, on the one hand, the trial supervision procedure is expressly provided by the procedural law of the monitoring system, and the relevant state organs, social organizations and individuals on the supervision of judicial activities although there are some legal basis, but not as clearly stipulated by
The procedural law For instance, people’s congresses at all levels of court supervision is based on constitutional authority, the trial court the power to supervise the activities but such supervision is not a trial supervision of content, so even if the power authority discovers there is a judge of the Court big mistake, it must request the court to supervise
The investigations by the trial hearing and decide whether to correct the verdict. On the other hand, the trial supervision procedure was mainly adopted by the parties themselves and the court complaint and prosecutors of the protest and launched, the procedure for trial supervision ultimately depends on whether the Court agreed to the program, in this sense, the trial supervision