Does not have its own special proceedings, and agree that no separate procedure and only the second trial of first instance procedure for trial supervision program features 2. Procedure Law of China also have made this provision. For example, the Code of Civil Procedure section 184 provides that: "the people’s court in accordance with the procedures of judicial supervision to
Retry a case of a legally effective decision or ruling was made by the Court of First Instance, in accordance with the procedure of first instance trial, the verdict, ruled by the first nike dunks second instance court, and in accordance with the procedure of second instance trial, the verdict, ruled that a legally effective decision, ruled that the superior court for
Trial, according to trial supervision procedures, in accordance with the procedure of second instance trial, the verdict, ruling was legally effect, ruled, "that is, the trial supervision procedure or to apply for the second trial of first instance of the program or procedure. It should be noted, however, despite the activities of judicial supervision is still a continuation of trial
Does Not Have Its Own
Trial Supervision Procedure Is An
Trial supervision procedure, is an essential supervisory measures. As the object of judicial supervision is an effective verdict and ruled that the trial supervision procedure mainly for referee does have the error in force made, so it is an ex post monitoring measures. One view is that, due to the narrow scope of supervision afterwards, but is a completely passive
Surveillance measures, it should expand the scope of judicial oversight. We believe that this view is not appropriate, because the Full Court and the Court within the sole judge of court prior to strengthen supervision means nike dunk sb to achieve these referees Cengcengbaguan approval and reporting and by the leadership to listen to instructions, this can only strengthen the During the trial
Of administrative oversight mechanisms, but it does not comply with the rules of trial is not conducive to ensuring the impartiality of judges. Second, the trial supervision procedure system and the difference between first and second instance proceedings Procedure for trial supervision procedures are also different from the first and second instance. The trial supervision procedure, generally agreed that it