By the court for retrial of the case, it is the continuation of trial activity, therefore, the trial supervision procedure must have a specific procedure. As we have pointed out, there are trial must also have procedures, activities and fair trial procedures are inseparable, the lack of judicial oversight is impossible to guarantee the normal activities, and also difficult to
Implement a fair retrial. In practice, precisely because the trial supervision procedure in the procedural rights enjoyed by the parties can not be effectively protected, thus creating a monitoring process during the trial nike dunks a range of issues, especially at the trial failed to strictly monitor the trial to take the open system side. Article 125 of our Constitution states: "People’s
Court case, in addition to the special circumstances provided for by law, all public trial," we believe that certainly the case here under the supervision procedures, including through the trial of cases dealt with only through public hearings can guarantee the fairness of the trial and can effectively prevent the phenomenon of judicial corruption. However, the majority did not use

Trial in the first instance the parties to the program enjoyed some of the basic procedural rights should be fully respected and protected. If the public demands the right of judges to require avoidance of the right to request an open hearing of the right to request the right to crossexamination and so on. In practice, the procedural rights of
The parties in the trial supervision procedure sometimes not been fully respected. One view is that the parties enjoy the right of these procedures is mainly during the second trial in the first nike dunk sb instance, the law for the protection of an impartial referee and give the parties enjoy, but the trial supervision procedure is to correct the error in force
While the referee set, so the parties in the first instance, the procedural rights enjoyed by the second instance is not fully applicable to the procedure for trial supervision. We believe that this view is debatable. While the trial supervision procedure is already in force to correct the trial judge and set the procedure, but it is still carried out

Two occurred after the final trial, the trial supervision procedure in the launch after the first go through a hearing to determine the original decision and ruled that there error, the decision to suspend the original ruling and the ruled, but not without first hearing on the withdrawal of the original sentence ruling. In addition, the formal judicial organization is
Also different. Trial supervision program must take collegiate system, which can be used with the procedure of first instance in the sole system is different. Because the second trial of first instance nike dunks trial supervision procedures and different procedures, so the second instance of copying the first instance procedure is inappropriate. We say that the trial supervision procedure can not copy
The second trial of first instance procedure, not to say that the second trial of first instance trial supervision procedures for different procedures, both still in some of the procedures are the same, which in addition to requirements in the trial supervision procedure shall form a collegial panel also heard other cases, especially in the trial supervision procedure, the second